|
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 9, 2011 4:53:41 GMT -6
I think we should: Kill Squink Redirect Sister Coyote to Peeker
|
|
|
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 9, 2011 6:09:20 GMT -6
Alive: I. total ullz II. cookies IV. sistercoyote VI. peeker VII. hockey monkey VIII. texcat IX. paranoia XI. renata XII. storyteller XVII. guiri XVIII. brewha XX. mister blockey XXI. crazypunker XXII. catinasuit XXV. metallic squink XXVI. special ed
Dead: XIX. sachertorte - Tracker V. pleonast - vanilla XIV. mhaye - Mason XV. mahaloth - Scum Roleblocker XXIV. rysto - third party survivor XIII. Inner Stickler - vanilla III. billmc - Mason XVI. naf1138 - Scum Godfather X. suburban plankton - vanilla XXIII. charr
|
|
|
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 9, 2011 6:15:40 GMT -6
If we make the kill toNight we're starting Day 6 with 11 townies (assuming no other 3rd) 1 Hockey Monkey 3 scum I'm hoping we can lynch crazy toMorrow - but we can't be sure. But I'll do my best to push for that lynch and the lynch of Hockey Monkey. If we're lucky that would buy CatInASuit some time Then (hoping we get the kill through) Day 7 will be 9 townies 1 Hockey Monkey 3 scum I want to know what you both think of me trying to dig up the posts of CatInASuit Day 7??? In this game it seems very risky and people seem to be very willing to be "lead" to the lynch. So if I push too hard CatInASuit might get lynched. On the other hand - it's starting to look a bit strange that I'm completely ignoring the case...
|
|
|
Post by renata on Jan 9, 2011 7:43:41 GMT -6
I think that works, the orders so far. Squink will surely not roleblock me again, so the kill should go through, anyway.
|
|
|
Night 5
Jan 9, 2011 14:04:33 GMT -6
Post by catinasuit on Jan 9, 2011 14:04:33 GMT -6
just checking in. Agree with renata killing squink and ulla redirecting sis C to peekercpa.
I'll think of someone to track in due course, there aren't that many candidates left.
|
|
|
Night 5
Jan 9, 2011 15:27:56 GMT -6
Post by renata on Jan 9, 2011 15:27:56 GMT -6
You might be able to push on CIAS, Ulla; it's not like there aren't other candidates about for the lynch. If it's him, then yuck in one sense, but it costs us little power-wise at this point,and you could get some town cred. If it's someone else, even better. Just be careful with your wording,of course.
|
|
|
Night 5
Jan 10, 2011 3:28:02 GMT -6
Post by catinasuit on Jan 10, 2011 3:28:02 GMT -6
Ok, I have updated the Knowledge of the Dark and it still makes grim reading . Looking at it, we still need to engineer 5 mislynches to get the game. 16 players - 6NK - 5 mis = 5 (3 scum, 2 town) assuming HM does get lynched and we win after an NK If Hockey Monkey is not lynched, then it's 16 players - 5NK - 5 mis = 6 (3 scum, 2 town, 1 3rd) and we win following a mislynch. Regardless we still need to generate 5 more mislynches and generating 9 mislynches in a game to win?? ouch. Assuming all goes well tonight, it is likely to be a straight lynch fight between crazypunker and myself tomorrow. If anything goes wrong, I will be claiming doctor, as it is reasonably possible the roles does not exist in the game setup. If it does, then hopefully it should flush out the real doc to be dealt with. I shouldn'e be upset really, aiming into the unknown pool did flush out an investigative role as I has hoped. Just a shame that, they got spotted the Night before. Also, be extra nice to squink. That roleblock on Night 0 prevented Ulla from being spotted by Sis C when she didn't redirect from Ed to peekercpa. Oh wait, that's tonight's kill. ;D Of course, I just know that having planned this, something will bite us in the proverbial. Here's hoping otherwise.
|
|
|
Night 5
Jan 10, 2011 3:38:19 GMT -6
Post by catinasuit on Jan 10, 2011 3:38:19 GMT -6
Ok, Night action, these to choose from: II. cookies VIII. texcat XVIII. brewha XX. mister blockey xXXVI. special ed
Mister B hasn't been around much, but his vote on Mahaloth has pinged me somewhat
I wonder if Ed is a power considering his comment back to Squink about suspicion and his attacks on storyteller. He knows he has a get out card if worst comes to worst.
texcat, I'm unsure of but leaning vanilla, dito for brewha
cookies? I never can tell with cookies.
Hmm
Oh why not,.
CIAS to track Mr Ed
Renata to kill metallicsquink
|
|
|
Night 5
Jan 10, 2011 3:50:14 GMT -6
Post by catinasuit on Jan 10, 2011 3:50:14 GMT -6
I'm an idiot, we have a Doc Claim which makes it really really likely that we don't have a doc in the game at all.
I have updated the thread with a list of all the Night Targets that it would have reasonable to protect and still be clear of everything.
The temptation is now to claim and have one of you two counter claim doc. One of us will die, but the other would be pretty much confirmed in everyone else's eyes
Let's keep that as a back up plan shall we.
|
|
|
Night 5
Jan 10, 2011 3:51:29 GMT -6
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 10, 2011 3:51:29 GMT -6
ToMorrow I was thinking of trying to get Crazypunker lynched. The last post he made Day 5 to me about pinging him justifies me looking more closely at him. At Day 6 any player looked at can have something thrown at them Redirect Sister Coyote to Peeker
|
|
|
Night 5
Jan 10, 2011 3:52:19 GMT -6
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 10, 2011 3:52:19 GMT -6
Don't know where that color came from Redirect Sister Coyote to Peeker
|
|
|
Night 5
Jan 10, 2011 5:55:12 GMT -6
Post by catinasuit on Jan 10, 2011 5:55:12 GMT -6
I have had a horrible thought.
If metallicsquink blocks renata again and Sis C looks in the same direction, we will have an outed scum for no Night Kill. Also if SisC is not looking at peekercpa with have a problem anyway as it would indicate a redirect.
Now, strictly speaking, Sis C should be looking at peekercpa and Squink should be blocking someone else, but is it worth making sure?
The choice is in making sure we get a kill through vs controlling where Sis C looks. renata should still be carrying out the kill but the choice is between.
redirect SisC to peekercpa redirect squink to squink (ie. a self block)
Also: there is the choice of redirecting squink to SisC, which would raise all sorts of questions in the morning, but would probably give a hint of a redirector as well.
Ulla, it's your choice. Horrible thought over, if SisC looks at squink and we control the redirect, she gets the two of you for squink's death. Ignore me.
|
|
|
Night 5
Jan 10, 2011 5:55:57 GMT -6
Post by catinasuit on Jan 10, 2011 5:55:57 GMT -6
and the only other amusing thing is a New Year resolution to conribute more to the game HAS got me into more trouble. Typical.
|
|
|
Night 5
Jan 10, 2011 12:35:08 GMT -6
Post by renata on Jan 10, 2011 12:35:08 GMT -6
At this point I think our only realistic chance is a higher than average number of neutral parties (like, 5 competing survivors, or some such) reducing our mislynch burden.
Doctor counterclaim is quite interesting. Only problem is there's no real excuse for a claimed (and "proven", at that) doc to live for very long. We could probably string it out a couple of days, though, with careful choice of kill order and redirects.
|
|
|
Night 5
Jan 10, 2011 12:38:42 GMT -6
Post by renata on Jan 10, 2011 12:38:42 GMT -6
The counterclaimer could say they'd been sitting on Metallic Squink or Guiri for whatever nights SisC was watching peeker, and peeker otherwise, I suppose.
|
|
|
Night 5
Jan 10, 2011 14:40:40 GMT -6
Post by bufftabby on Jan 10, 2011 14:40:40 GMT -6
Track, kill, redirect confirmed.
|
|