|
Post by texcat on Jan 8, 2011 22:07:56 GMT -6
Ugh. At least not the worst mislynch I've ever seen. I was willing to give Charr the benefit of my doubt while he was still at least nominally around. Once he totally disappeared I thought he needed to go. We were never going to learn anything else about him.
I am in favor of trying once again to kill CIAS tonight. I've convinced myself that he is the scum scotsman. Although, I did have some odd thought today that he could be a self-protecting doc?
Scum list toNight is CIAS, Renata, Ed, and ?. Total or Blockey?
Do you have any thoughts on claiming? I'm generally never in favor of claiming, and I don't think that we have much information to share other than being able to confirm each other.
|
|
|
Post by hermit on Jan 9, 2011 2:29:19 GMT -6
Meh. The danger is that we're going to spend the next several Days performing policy lynches of crazypunker, Hockey and maybe Story and Sister. There are good reasons to lynch them all but I don't have strong scum reads on any of them.
Let's kill Renata. I've re-read her posts a couple of times and I think we'd have a really hard time pushing a case against her based on what she's actually said and done in the game.
While there's still a fair amount of support for a crazypunker lynch, we may be successful pushing the case against CIAS toMorrow.
If we manage to force a claim from CIAS which doesn't reveal a protective power or an immunity from a Night kill, one of us may be forced to claim in order to get him lynched. Otherwise I don't think we've much to gain from claiming and I don't think it will help Town to have 2 almost-confirmed players unless either there's a Cop claim (and there's a bigger group of almost-confirmed) or we decide on a mass claim.
I'm somewhat annoyed by metallic's lack of participation and voting. I'd had a decent town read but am now doubting it. Same for Blockey but my town read was purely based on his mahaloth vote.
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Jan 9, 2011 12:40:51 GMT -6
I was hoping that if we killed CIAS toNight and he flipped scum scotsman that we would prevent the lynch of crazypunker toMorrow. But it certainly looks more likely that we can get CIAS lynched than Renata, though I think crazypunker may get a lot of votes. I did find it interesting metallic blocked Renata -- we're not the only ones who find her suspicious. Though at first glance it doesn't appear that the block prevented a scum kill -- so he's probably unlikely to repeat it toNight. The other advantage of a Renata kill would be that scum retaliation is less likely.
I will agree with either a Renata or CIAS kill.
|
|
|
Post by hermit on Jan 9, 2011 13:29:19 GMT -6
OK, let's kill CIAS and hope that he dies this time and that we are right about both him and crazy.
Of course Metallic could have lied about who she blocked last Night, hoping to get a reaction out of either you or Renata but I don't think this is likely (didn't the roleblocker in EDII lie about blocking someone hoping to set a trap?).
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Jan 9, 2011 18:57:25 GMT -6
lol. Yes, it was me! Brewha claimed to have blocked me twice, and there were no night kills either night. I sure thought I was a lynched vanilla townie, even after he confessed to having blocked someone else the second night.
I can't see a reason for Metallic to lie. It's not usual for the blocker to learn that they actually blocked something, is it? I would have thought that Metallic only knows that the scum kill apparently went through every night and so he hasn't blocked the scum killer yet. Paranoia chastised him for blocking randomly, but what else can you do except block who you think is scummy until you see some result?
I'm a little reluctant to go against your first instincts twice, since you are clearly a better player with better intuition, but
Texcat kills CIAS.
And I will check back on Monday, in case you wake up in the middle of the night and decide that this is wrong.
|
|
|
Post by bufftabby on Jan 10, 2011 14:44:25 GMT -6
Kill confirmed.
|
|