Night 3

[texcat]

Based on the death of Rysto, last Night, I don't think the scum are going after the known townies. I think I should once again protect you tonight.

And I'm not sure what to think about crazypunker now. Clearly the role was true. The alignment??

NAF still looks scummy. I'm less sure about CIAS and Ed.

[hermit]

I think scum investigated or watched Rysto Night 1, figured he was a cop or doc and then killed him Night 2. Otherwise how did the Day 1 case completely fall apart Day 2 with CIAS and Inner not even mentioning their Day 1 suspicions?

I was going to vote for crazy but I got very suspicious of the late votes on him and changed my mind. I'm always wary of who else is on the bandwagon and the reasons they give when I consider joining. One of my pet peeves is people leap-frogging off someone else's case without adding any additional comments or opinion and I strongly disagree with people who simply wanted to test his scotsman power (thus making him vanilla) without expressing suspicion that he's scum. As ever, the same names pop up: NAF, Renata and now Inner (who's looking scummier and scummier) along with Charr and brewha - I was looking forward to seeing CIAS pile on too... Now, NAF voted 7th, at 6 votes crazypunker had the highest number of votes anyone has had so far in the game, why bother? Bussing a fellow scum and wanting his vote on record or simply making a safe vote which won't attract much attention? Same goes for Renata's vote switch, why bother? And why piggyback off Bill's case without adding anything or mentioning the flawed reasoning pointed out by others? And Inner's late vote?

I suggest we kill NAF toNight. His attack on my veiled defense of crazypunker will probably be brought up toMorrow and I'd rather not have to claim.

If scum and Hockey get their way, toMorrow will be focused on lynching either Charr or Crazypunker again and the next Day will likely be the other one so we should be using our kill. I'm not worried about being killed, my case against CIAS got no traction but notice how no-one defended him either, the same happened with mahaloth. CIAS also lied (about the argument with cookies which took up so much time) and misrepresented story.

[hermit]

Of course we could also kill:
- Hockey Monkey to remove any chance of her being a threat to our wincon
- crazypunker to settle the alignment question (but I hope a cop will do that toNight)
- charr (or Blockey) to get rid of non-participants

We both find NAF highly suspicious and so think we have a decent chance of hitting scum. We can keep Hockey and charr/crazy for another Night.

[texcat]

And one of my pet peeves is people jumping off a vote just because of a claim. If you thought the person was suspicious before, why would you believe the claim and jump off? But I agree that voting crazypunker just to test his claim is a bad reason to vote.

Interesting theory about Rysto.

I can agree to killing NAF. Shall I do it?

I don't think killing non-participants like charr or blockey is worthwhile. I'd much rather try to kill scum.

[hermit]

OK, let's kill NAF. You do it

[texcat]

Texcat kills NAF.

[bufftabby]

Confirmed.