|
Day two
Dec 8, 2010 23:22:43 GMT -6
Post by texcat on Dec 8, 2010 23:22:43 GMT -6
Thoughts?
In addition to us witches, I see we also have 3 masons. With one dead I guess we've got to believe their claims.
I'm not sure what to make of Story, but it seems all a little too odd to be fabricated to me.
Charr just seems like a befuddled townie to me. If he had just said that he didn't see any real good cases and was just going to vote Rysto on his gut feeling, we probably would have accepted it without too many questions.
I like your case on Mahaloth, but Ed still looks scummy to me. Ed has posted nothing but fluff toDay. And not much yesterday except his lists and refusing to acknowledge that "help out" almost certainly did not mean help expose.
I am mad as a hornet at Paranoia. I don't understand why he's not more active; he was when I've played with him before. I doubt if he's scum, but I certainly understand why he's getting votes.
I will almost certainly take my vote off Total and put it somewhere else, but haven't made up my mind where yet.
|
|
|
Day two
Dec 9, 2010 16:27:36 GMT -6
Post by hermit on Dec 9, 2010 16:27:36 GMT -6
Yeah, I'm glad neither of us were forced to claim, I may have misused the term "mason" and got myself counter-claimed and lynched for it! Note to self: witches are not masons, witches are witches With MHaye dead, there's no reason not to believe that Bill and Peeker are telling the truth - what a bunch, scum got lucky with their kill (or a PFK ! I'm treating story's stuff as a null tell. I got dragged into a similar discussion when special ed claimed a post restriction in LOTR. If he acts scummily, we'll vote him but for now I'm not going to second the Mod. I agree about charr and I think s/he may have given her/himself away as a power role - a bit of stage fright and an overeager attempt to prove that s/he had no info when placing the vote. You're right about Special Ed, he's not participating in any useful way.
|
|
|
Day two
Dec 10, 2010 15:34:28 GMT -6
Post by texcat on Dec 10, 2010 15:34:28 GMT -6
After squink posted her PM, I just went back and noticed that both of our PMs also say "when the all threats". I hadn't noticed the word order before.
|
|
|
Day two
Dec 10, 2010 16:41:17 GMT -6
Post by hermit on Dec 10, 2010 16:41:17 GMT -6
Neither had I. I just checked and the sample PM has the same word order...
Who do you plan to vote for? We've got story, paranoia, charr and metallic on 2 votes apiece and rysto, mahaloth, cias, naf and brewha with 1 vote. 9 players! I'd consider doubling up on NAF or CIAS if no-one joins me in voting mahaloth...
|
|
|
Day two
Dec 10, 2010 18:30:39 GMT -6
Post by texcat on Dec 10, 2010 18:30:39 GMT -6
I still think Ed looks the scummiest. And he just broke the tie by voting Story. I would vote Ed, except another one-off vote isn't really going to help the situation.
I was considering joining you on Mahaloth. I definitely think you made a pretty good case and no one seems to be listening to it. And if Mahaloth flipped scum, I might quit concentrating on Ed.
I still need to reread the Day, because I missed a lot of the todo with metallic on first read. Now with 3 votes on Story, our 2 votes wouldn't be enough to lynch NAF or CIAS, it would just cause a losing tie.
|
|
|
Day two
Dec 10, 2010 22:50:15 GMT -6
Post by texcat on Dec 10, 2010 22:50:15 GMT -6
I did vote Mahaloth. Didn't Sister vote him yesterday, and she still hasn't voted yet today, so we might still get a wagon going. On reread, the only thing I noticed that I did not post about was NAF. He voted paranoia as a lurker, but chided me very hard for voting Total for not voting. He also wanted the masons to claim. Why? Why should the masons have claimed? It seems like a mistake to me. We can't protect all of these people. Hey all, sorry I didn't come back sooner. Having cycles start so late in the Day is going to make me always feel a bit behind. Ok, I think I can actually play toDay. 1) I am still not happy with Paranoia. He didn't participate yesterDay! Even when he came back and started participating, his one big infodump post was an empty shell. There was no there there and I am a little disappointed that it got him some unvotes. Had I been around I would have been pushing hard for his and since I am here now... Vote: parinoia [/color] 2) I don't want to see TL fall to the same sort of bad reasoning that we lost Pleo to. TexCat, TL hasn't voted on Day One in her last several games. You were just in a game with her where she did the exact same thing on Day 1 and was town. Her not voting isn't a tell, and it's a really bad vote. Be mad at her for continuing to sign up for games she can't play in (I am, it's fucking annoying*) but voting for her is dumb. 3) I am only going to say this once because I don't want to spend so much time on a soapbox toDay, but Masons should start seriously considering claiming right now. Seriously considering it. If there are only 2 masons alive YOU MUST CLAIM. A solitary living mason is useless and the risk of one of you getting killed at random is too high, particularly this early in the game. Ok, imma shut up for a bit now. [/quote]
|
|