|
Day 5
Jan 7, 2011 8:45:30 GMT -6
Post by catinasuit on Jan 7, 2011 8:45:30 GMT -6
NAF was good wasn't he. I hoping to allay my voters by actually doing some analysis, but somehow I doubt it will work. Probably only make it worse. The question is do we have a doc around. I agree with killing squink seeing as we have another target to redirect, probably directly to peekercpa. Hmm, still behind in the general game, but not as far as it could be.
|
|
|
Day 5
Jan 7, 2011 10:56:23 GMT -6
Post by renata on Jan 7, 2011 10:56:23 GMT -6
@ Ulla -- just don't do it in a game I'm in. I'd like to think I'd have been all over that sort of behavior if I was a townie. It can stand out once you know to look for it.
But yes,he is good.
|
|
|
Day 5
Jan 7, 2011 10:57:45 GMT -6
Post by renata on Jan 7, 2011 10:57:45 GMT -6
Interesting that squink roleblocked me, to (or thought she did). I should not be guessed as scum killer based on that, as long as Ulla remains undetected. It's hardly definitive even without a scum redirector in the game, but it might act on some people subconsciously.
|
|
|
Day 5
Jan 7, 2011 12:18:23 GMT -6
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 7, 2011 12:18:23 GMT -6
Things are looking good toDay. CatInASuit seems to have convinced with the vote on crazypunker I'll leave my vote where it is (unless something changes BIG time) and we should be able to get yet another townie-lynch toDay. This will leave us Charr/Crazypunker for toMorrow AND Hockey Monkey as well - that should be able to create a bit of noise and (hopefully) leave us in peace. I have no idea what to make of the blocks by Metallic. They seem random and strange at best... My first thought was to ask her if she would be notified if they were a success. But I feel that might be pushing my luck and making me sound like a concerned scummy.
|
|